Grammatical difference between British and American English

Content

American English…………………………………………………2

Lexical difference…………………………………………………4

Grammatical difference…………………………………………..6

Bibliography……………………………………………….8

Grammatical difference between British and American English.

American English.

In the early part of the seventeenth century English settlers began

to bring their language to America, and another series of changes began to

take place. The settlers borrowed words from Indian languages for such

strange trees as the hickory and persimmon, such unfamiliar animals as

raccoons and woodchucks. Later they borrowed other words from settlers from

other countries – for instance, chowder and prairie from the French, scow

and sleigh from the Dutch. They made new combinations of English words,

such as backwoods and bullfrog, or gave old English words entirely new

meanings, such as lumber ( which in British English means approximately

junk ) and corn ( which in British means any grain, especially wheat ).

Some of the new terms were needed, because there were new and un-English

things to talk about. Others can be explained only on the general theory

that languages are always changing, and American English is no exception.

Aside from the new vocabulary, differences in pronunciation, in

grammatical construction, and especially in intonation developed. If the

colonization had taken place a few centuries earlier, American might have

become as different from English as French is from Italian. But the

settlement occurred after the invention of printing, and continued through

a period when the idea of educating everybody was making rapid progress.

For a long time most of the books read in America came from England, and a

surprising number of Americans read those books, in or out of school.

Moreover, most of the colonists seem to have felt strong ties with England.

In this they were unlike their Anglo-Saxon ancestors, who apparently made a

clean break with their continental homes.

A good many Englishmen and some Americans used to condemn every

difference that did develop, and as recently as a generation ago it was not

unusual to hear all “Americanisms” condemned, even in America. It is now

generally recognized in this country that we are not bound to the Queen’s

English, but have a full right to work out our own habits. Even a good many

of the English now concede this, though some of them object strongly to the

fact that Americanisms are now having an influence on British usage.

There are thousands of differences in detail between British and

American English, and occasionally they crowd together enough to make some

difficulty. If you read that a man, having trouble with his lorry, got out

his spanner and lifted the bonnet to see what was the matter, you might not

realize that the driver of the truck had taken out his wrench and lifted

the hood. It is amusing to play with such differences, but the theory that

the American language is now essentially different from English does not

hold up. It is often very difficult to decide whether a book was written by

an American or an English man. Even in speech it would be hard to prove

that national differences are greater than some local differences in either

country. On the whole, it now seems probable that the language habits of

the two countries will grow more, rather than less, alike, although some

differences will undoubtedly remain and others may develop.

It also seems probable that there will be narrow-minded and snobbish

people in both countries for some time to come. But generally speaking,

anybody who learnsto speak and write the standard English of his own

country, and to regard that of the other country as a legitimate variety

with certain interesting differences, will have little trouble wherever he

goes.

Lexical difference.

Lexical differences of american variant highly extensive on the

strength of multiple borrowing from spanish and indian languages, what was

not in british english.

American variant British

variant

Subway «метро» underground

the movies «кинотеатр» the cinema

shop «магазин» store

sidewalk «тротуар» pavement

line «очередь» queue

soccer «футбол» football

mailman «почтальон» postman

vacation «каникулы» holiday

corn «кукуруза» maize

fall «осень» autumn

Also claim attention differences in writing some words in american and

british variants of language.

For instance, following:

American variant British variant

honor honour

traveler traveller

plow plough

defense defence

jail gaol

center centre

apologize apologise

Grammatical difference.

Grammatical differences of american variant consist in following:

1. In that events, when Britainians use Present Perfect, in Staffs can

be used and Present Perfect, and Past Simple.

2. Take a shower/a bath instead of have a shower/a bath.

3. Shall is not used. In all persons is used by will.

4. Needn't (do) usually is not used. Accustomed form -don't need to

(do).

5. After demand, insist, require etc should usually is NOT used. I

demanded that he apologize (instead of I demanded that he should

apologise in british variant).

6. to/in THE hospital instead of to/in hospital in BrE.

7. on the weekend/on weekend instead of at the weekend/at weekend.

8. on a street instead of in a street.

9. Different from or than instead of different to/from

10. Write is used with to or without the pretext.

11. Past participle of "got" is "gotten"

12. To burn, to spoil and other verbs, which can be regular or

irregular in the british variant, in the american variant ALWAYS

regular.

13. Past Perfect, as a rule, is not used completely.

Bibliography

1. Murphy Raymond. English Grammar in Use. - Cambridge University Press,

1997.

2. Орлов Г.А. Современный английский язык в Австралии. –Москва, «Высшая

школа», 1978.

3. Варианты полинациональных литературных языков – Киев, «Наукова думка»,

1981.

4. Швейцер А.Д. Американский вариант литературного английского языка: пути

формирования и современный статус.//Вопросы языкознания,1995, №6,стр. 3-

17.

Г.Б.Антрушина, О.В.Афанасьева. Лексикология английского языка. - М. Изд.

Дрофа. 1999

F.R.Palmer. Semantics. A new outline. - M. V.Sh. 1982.

Александрова С.Я. Семантический анализ сложноподчиненных предложений с

придаточными, вводимыми союзами as и as thougt // Вопросы грамматической

структуры предложения и текста в английском языке:Сб. науч. тр. - М., 1985.

- Вып.247. - С.86-96.

Бабалова Л.Л. Об употреблении союзов и, а, но в сложном предложении //

Русский язык за рубежом. - 1980. - N4. - С.57-62.

Биренбаум Я.Г. К теории сложного предложения (На материале английского

языка) // Вопросы языкознания. - 1982. - N2. - С.50-58.

Биренбаум Я.Г. Сопоставление сложноподчиненных предложений русского и

английского языков // Сопоставительный лингвистический анализ: Науч. тр. -

Куйбышев, 1977. - Т.202. - С.29-32.

Валимова Г.В. О сочинительных союзах в сложном предложении // Материалы IX

и X конференций Северо-Кавказского зонального объединения кафедр русского

языка. - Ростов н/Д: Изд-во Рост. ун-та, 1971. - С.87-93.

Верховская И.П. К вопросу о классификации сложноподчиненных предложений в

современном английском языке // Проблемы грамматики английского языка: Сб.

науч. тр. - М,1981. - Вып.173. - С.31-43.

Гвоздев А.Н. Современный русский литературный язык. Ч.2: Синтаксис. - М.:

Просвещение, 1958. - 301 с.

Гепнер Ю.Р. Сложное предложение и принципы его изучения: Учеб. пособие. -

Харьков, 1963.

Данкова М.П. Структурные и статистические характеристики сложносочиненных

предложений в авторской и разговорной речи художественной прозы (на

материале английского языка) // Теория и практика лингвистического описания

разговорной речи. - Горький, 1976. - Вып.7. - С.127-133.

Жельвис В.И. К вопросу о видах синтаксической связи между частями сложного

союзного предложения (На материале английского языка) // Ученые записки

Ленинградского государственного педагогического института. Кафедра

английского языка. - 1958. - Т.181, вып.3. - С.343-366.

Жельвис В.И. Существуют ли в языке сочинительные и подчинительные союзы ?

(На материале английского языка) // Ученые записки Ленинградского

государственного педагогического института. Вопросы английской филологии.

-1962. - Т.226. - С.253-273.

Ильиш Б.А. Современный английский язык: Теорет. курс. : Учеб. пособие для

вузов. -2-е изд., испр. и доп. - М., 1948. - 347 с.

Ильиш Б.А. Строй современного английского языка: Учеб. пособие для

студ.пед.ин-тов.-2-е изд. - Л.: Просвещение, 1971. - 365 с.

Ильиш Б.А. Структура сложноподчиненного предложения в современном

английском языке // Ученые записки Ленингр. гос. пед. ин-та. Вопросы

английской филологии. - 1962. - Т.226. - С.3-25.

Иофик Л.Л. Сложное предложение в новоанглийском языке. - Л.: Изд-во Ленигр.

ун-та, 1968.

Карпова Л.В. О функциональном критерии в синтаксисе (на материале

сложноподчиненных предложений с союзом as, when) // Некоторые проблемы

слова и предложения в современном английском языке: Респ. сб. - Горький,

1976. - С.176-192.

Конькова И.П. Сложносочиненное союзное предложение в современном английском

языке. Душанбе, 1969. - 240 с.

Леденев Ю.И. О наиболее существенных свойствах русских союзов // Русский

язык: Материалы и исследования - Ставрополь, 1971. - Вып.3. - С.36-42.

Оганесова Р.Д., Скорлуповская Е.В. О выделении сочинительных союзов //

Материалы IX и X конференций Северо-Кавказского зонального объединения

кафедр русского языка. - Ростов н/Д: Изд-во Рост. ун-та, 1971. - С.94-102.

Петерсон М.Н. Союзы в русском языке // Русский язык в школе. - 1952. - N5.

- С.28-34.

Хаймович Б.С., Роговская Б.И. Теоретическая грамматика английского

языка:Учеб.пособие для вузов. - М.: Высшая школа,1967. - 297с.

Ширяев Е.Н. Дифференциация сочинительных и подчинительных союзов на

синтаксической основе// Филологические науки. - 1980. - N2. - С.49-54.

Семантико-стилистические исследования текста и предложения:Межвуз. сб.

науч. тр. / Отв.ред. З.Я.Тураева. - Л., 1980. - 125 с.

Качалова К.Н., Израилевич Е.Е. Практическая грамматика английского языка с

упражнениями и ключами. М, 1997. - 717 с.

Бархударов Л.С., Штелинг Д.А. Грамматика английского языка. - М., 1973.

Гальперин И.Р. Очерки по стилистике английского языка. - М., 1958.

Cronin A.J. The Citadel. - М., 1966.

Galsworthy J. To let. - М, 1954.

London I. Martin Eden. - М., 1954.

Green G. Quet Amerikan. - М., 1956.

Hardy T. Tess of the d’ Urbervilles. - М, 1950.

Dickens Ch. Adventures of Oliver Twist. - M., 1949.